Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Marton Fucsovics vs Conor Niland Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fucsovics vs Niland analysis and find out who is favored!
Marton Fucsovics vs Conor Niland Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Fucsovics 1 - 0 Niland
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fucsovics has won 56.68% of points on their second serve, while Niland has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fucsovics, in recent form, has won 51.15% of their opponent's second serve points, while Niland has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.69% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fucsovics has saved 67.11% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Niland has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fucsovics has won 60% of matches played (W/L 30/ 20), with Niland winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fucsovics has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 58% (W/L 33/ 24), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 141/ 108). Niland has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 87/ 61), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 48% (W/L 11/ 12).
- Player level: In the last year, Fucsovics has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 62.96% of matches (W/L 17/ 10), where as Niland has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Fucsovics winning 1 times and Niland being victorious 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Fucsovics winning 3 and Niland winning 2. The last match between Fucsovics and Niland was at the Davis Cup, Group II, 1R, HUN-IRL 3-2, 10-02-2012, Rubber 2, Carpet with Marton Fucsovics getting the victory 7-6(4) 6-4 6-7(3) 2-6 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Fucsovics and Niland have played a deciding set 1 times, with Fucsovics winning 1 times and Niland 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Fucsovics winning 1, and Niland 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fucsovics has played against opponents with an average rank of 179.14 while Niland has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fucsovics has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Niland has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fucsovics has converted 48.94% of breakpoint opportunities, and Niland has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
55
Rank
31
High
32
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
129
High
42
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
Form
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
57% (454-338)
Career Total W/L
56% (268-207)
63% (15-9)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$4,322,904
Career Prize Money
$56,485
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Marton Fucsovics | Conor Niland |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 2 |
| Games Won | 27 | 25 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(4) 6-4 6-7(3) 2-6 6-2 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Marton Fucsovics | Conor Niland |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 63% (15/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 60% (35/23) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (301/255) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 44% (4/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 75% (9/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.39 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 105 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.15 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 40 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:49:27 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 166 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (1056/1707) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (740/1056) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 57% (369/651) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (69/141) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (653/1691) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 69% (11/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 100% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 68% (15/22) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 43% (3/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (16/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (16/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 38% (8/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Marton Fucsovics Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Stefanos Tsitsipas
Player
Marton Fucsovics
68%
(
58 of
85)
1st Serve %
64%
(
71 of
111)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
47 of
58)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
52 of
71)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
40)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
23 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
46 of
111)
108
Total Points Won
88
|
7-6(7) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexandre Muller
Player
Marton Fucsovics
69%
(
62 of
90)
1st Serve %
57%
(
50 of
87)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
46 of
62)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
40 of
50)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
28 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
29 of
87)
91
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Marton Fucsovics
Player
Zachary Svajda
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marton Fucsovics
Player
Giulio Zeppieri
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
46%
(
29 of
63)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
7-5 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Marton Fucsovics
Player
Mariano Navone
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
69%
(
53 of
77)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
1
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Marton Fucsovics
Player
Alejandro Tabilo
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
71%
(
45 of
63)
12
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marton Fucsovics
Player
Corentin Moutet
60%
(
58 of
96)
1st Serve %
66%
(
71 of
108)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
40 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
53 of
108)
109
Total Points Won
95
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marton Fucsovics
Player
Tallon Griekspoor
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marton Fucsovics
Player
Valentin Vacherot
72%
(
62 of
86)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
35%
(
30 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
84
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(8) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Conor Niland Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 2 | 2-6 6-1 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Yuki Bhambri
Player
Conor Niland
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
28 of
45)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Go Soeda
Player
Conor Niland
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
56%
(
20 of
36)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
56
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 4 | 6-1 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 7-6(4) 6-4 6-7(3) 2-6 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Pablo Carreno-Busta
Player
Conor Niland
60%
(
54 of
90)
1st Serve %
78%
(
80 of
102)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
50 of
80)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
34%
(
31 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
44 of
102)
103
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Conor Niland
Player
Dorian Descloix
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
2
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
3
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
70
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 3-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Stephane Bohli
Player
Conor Niland
52%
(
24 of
46)
1st Serve %
66%
(
47 of
71)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
8
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
71
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Fucsovics Vs Niland Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Fucsovics are available here and Niland photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
